Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived
Print Article Email Article

The Retiree Tax

Does $60,000 or $70,000 a year strike you as a Fat Cat income?

Probably not.

While millions of Americans would dearly love to earn that much, $5,000 or $6,000 a month isn't the sort of income that keeps Town and Country, the Robb Report, and Vogue stuffed with advertisements for luxury goods.

So let's ask another question.

Do you think a family at that income should pay taxes at a higher rate than a family with two, three, or four times the income?

Well, this is exactly what happens when you retire and start to collect Social Security benefits, thanks ever so much to our friends in Congress. First they made up to 50 percent of all benefits taxable, then they added a step that made up to 85 percent of all benefits taxable. While it was talked about as a tax on high-income people, the law is written so that it hits middle income retirees just as they are starting to get some breathing room. This happens because the tax is based on a formula that adds Social Security benefits to other sources of income.

To demonstrate the perversity of this tax lets imagine Harry and Sally Taxpayer and use TurboTax to calculate their income taxes as their dividend, interest, and pension income rises from $0 a year to $100,000. As long term workers, Harry gets $10,000 in Social Security benefits and Sally gets $12,000, giving them a total of $22,000 a year. This is about what two average income workers would receive. Here is what happens at different income levels (see table at end of column for more detail):

• They have no Federal income taxes to pay until their pension, dividend, and interest income exceeds $14,400, the combined total of their standard exemptions and standard deductions for 1999.

• At $15,000 they owe $92 in income taxes, an amount indicating a marginal tax rate of 15 percent. Each additional dollar of income is taxed at that rate until their non-Social Security income reaches $21,000.

• When their pension, dividend and interest income exceeds $21,000 a portion of their Social Security benefits becomes taxable. Between $21,000 and $22,000, for instance, $500 of Social Security benefits is added to taxable income. In effect, additional investment or pension income is surcharged, so the effective tax rate is 23 percent. A more literal interpretation is that both the normal income and the Social Security income, treated separately, are taxed at 15 percent.

• As their other income reaches $35,000, $7,700 of their Social Security benefits become taxable and the effective tax rate rises to 25 percent. As it rises toward $50,000, up to 85 percent of their Social Security benefits become taxable and their effective tax rate rises to 42 percent. Again, a more literal interpretation is that both normal income and the Social Security income, treated separately, are taxed at 28 percent. What people actually experience, however, is that an additional $1,000 in other income is taxed at premium rates. Don't look for a 42 percent figure in your published tax rates. According to them, the highest tax rate anyone pays is 39.6 percent and that doesn't start until your taxable income exceeds $283,l50.

• After $50,000 of other income Harry and Sally no longer pay taxes on Social Security benefits--- they've paid taxes on 85 percent of them. As a result each new dollar of income over $50,000 is taxed at a lower rate, 28 percent. Their other income can, in fact, double to $100,000 before they will start to pay taxes at a 31 percent rate.

As with all things taxable, there are lots of ways to calculate this. A different total for Social Security benefits would engage the tax at a different level of income from other sources.

The most important fact is that this isn't a tax on Fat Cats, it is a tax on middle income Americans who happen to be retired. In operation it is a kind of gauntlet, a beating all retirees must endure as their non-Social Security income approaches $50,000.

Is it possible to avoid the tax?

Not really. Even tax-free income from municipal bonds is counted in the income testing. The only way to avoid the tax is to keep your realized cash income below the amount that would trigger the tax--- $21,000 in this example. This means not making withdrawals from IRA accounts.

That's not a choice many people would make.

Soaking the Not-So-Rich

Other Income Total Cash Income Social Security Taxable Income Tax Tax Increase Marginal Rate

$0

$22,000

$0

$0

na

0

$14,400

$36,400

$0

$0

na

0

$15,000

$37,000

$0

$92

$92

15%

$20,000

$42,000

$0

$844

$752

15%

$21,000

$43,000

$0

$994

$150

15%

$22,000

$44,000

$500

$1,219

$225

23%

$23,000

$45,000

$1,000

$1,444

$225

23%

$24,000

$46,000

$1,500

$1,669

$225

23%

$25,000

$47,000

$2,000

$1,894

$225

23%

$30,000

$52,000

$4,500

$3,019

$1,125

23%

$35,000

$57,000

$7,700

$4,249

$1,230

25%

$40,000

$62,000

$11,950

$5,636

$1,387

28%

$45,000

$67,000

$16,200

$7,515

$1,879

38%

$50,000

$72,000

$18,700

$9,615

$2,100

42%

$55,000

$77,000

$18,700

$11,015

$1,400

28%

$60,000

$82,000

$18,700

$12,415

$1,400

28%

$65,000

$87,000

$18,700

$13,815

$1,400

28%

$70,000

$92,000

$18,700

$15,215

$1,400

28%

$75,000

$97,000

$18,700

$16,615

$1,400

28%

$80,000

$102,000

$18,700

$18,015

$1,400

28%

$85,000

$107,000

$18,700

$19,415

$1,400

28%

$90,000

$112,000

$18,700

$20,815

$1,400

28%

$95,000

$117,000

$18,700

$22,215

$1,400

28%

$100,000

$122,000

$18,700

$23,615

$1,400

28%

Source: Scott Burns, TurboTax 99'



Comments

 

ABModerator03 said:

[...] In effect, this has already made Social Security a "means tested" government benefit. What most people don't like is that the governments' idea of people who are so well off that their benefits should be taxed is a lot lower than theirs— $32,000 for a joint return and $25,000 on a single return, to be precise. (You can see how this works in a recent column) [...]
March 2, 2007 10:29 AM

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, was published in 2008 by Simon & Schuster. The paperback edition will be available in January, 2010.  "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife now live in Dripping Springs, a "hill country" town about 25 miles outside of Austin.


Contact Us

Open Monday-Friday
9 a.m. - 5 p.m. (CST)

ph. 972.535.4040
fx. 214.556.3848
Email Us

1255 W. 15th Street Suite 240 Plano, Texas 75075