Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived
Print Article Email Article

The Second Largest Tax Investors Pay

Allow me to introduce a new concept. I call it the Voluntary Graduated Financial Service Tax. It is one of the three taxes we pay on our savings.

Most readers are well aware of the other two taxes on our savings, both of which are involuntary. The first is the federal income tax on the return earned by our investments. We currently pay as little as 15 percent on dividends and capital gains from common stocks. But we can pay as much as 35 percent on interest income.

Most people hate this tax. So they will go to great lengths to defer, reduce, or avoid it. At this time of year our friends in financial services regale us with tax-reducing opportunities, such as "harvesting losses" to offset our realized gains, tax-efficient wrap accounts for the future, and tax-free bonds for the truly tax-phobic.

The other involuntary tax on our investment returns is inflation. The whole point of investing is to accumulate purchasing power for the future. If we save $100 today and it doubles in value to $200, we won't be pleased if prices double in the meantime. With a long-term inflation rate of 3.1 percent, money saved for 40 years will lose 70.5 percent of its purchasing power.

That's a really big tax.

Sadly, history shows that both political parties are worthless when it comes to protecting us from the effects of these two taxes. Democrats make promises that can't be fulfilled and raise taxes whenever possible. Republicans make promises that can't be fulfilled and borrow or print money whenever possible. Both parties promote inflation.

Fortunately, we can do something about the Voluntary Graduated Financial Services Tax. If we choose expensive financial services, we can pay at a high rate. If we choose to pay less for financial services, we can pay at a lower rate.

How big or small can this tax be?

Well, let's face it--- nothing is worse than inflation. The Voluntary Graduated Financial Services Tax, however, can be a lot worse than the highest income tax rate. By my calculation, accepting an annual expense ratio of 1.39 percent on an equity mutual fund is the equivalent of accepting a 40 percent tax rate from the financial services industry. The amount you accumulate in 40 years will be only 60 percent of what you could accumulate if there were no financial service expense.

Suppose, for instance, that you could invest $1,000 in large common stocks, earning the 10.7 percent annualized return found by Ibbotson Associates. Over 40 years your $1,000 would grow to $58,332. Think of that amount as the zero percent bracket for the Voluntary Graduated Financial Services Tax.

Invest in a low cost index fund at 0.20 percent a year and your accumulation will be reduced to $54,261. This implies a reduction in growth of a bit over $4,000. That's the equivalent of a 7 percent tax rate.

Invest in a low cost managed equity fund with an expense ratio of 0.79 percent and your accumulation will be reduced to $45,259. That's a growth reduction of over $13,000, or 23 percent.

Invest in an expensive managed equity fund at 1.39 percent and your accumulation will be cut to $35,188. That's a growth reduction of 40 percent.

Invest in a still more expensive managed fund at 1.79 percent annual expense (as many 403(b) plan participants do with variable annuities) and your accumulation will be cut to $30,388, a growth reduction of 49 percent.

Your Voluntary Graduated Financial Services Tax, in other words, can vary from less than 10 percent to nearly 50 percent. Since it is voluntary, you get to pick the rate.

Those on the sell side will be quick to tell us that superior marketing and management will get us superior returns that justify the additional cost.

That, friend, is fecal matter dropped from a large male grazing animal.

In the ten years ending October 31, the average annualized return of 1,372 domestic equity funds with 10-year track records was 8.63 percent, some 1.79 percent less than the S&P 500 Index. They trailed the index by a bit more than their average annual expense ratio of 1.34 percent, indicating that higher portfolio turnover also reduced performance.

My suggestion: do some "tax planning" for 2004 and beyond: Reduce your Voluntary Graduated Financial Services tax rate.



Comments

No Comments

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, was published in 2008 by Simon & Schuster. The paperback edition will be available in January, 2010.  "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife now live in Dripping Springs, a "hill country" town about 25 miles outside of Austin.


Contact Us

Open Monday-Friday
9 a.m. - 5 p.m. (CST)

ph. 972.535.4040
fx. 214.556.3848
Email Us

1255 W. 15th Street Suite 240 Plano, Texas 75075