AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived

Four Milestones for Successful Investing

yellowbrickroad-copy.jpgAllow me to introduce the yellow brick road of investing. Follow this road and you will be a happy investor. Ignore it at your peril.

The yellow brick road has four major milestones. The first three are clearly visible. Anyone can get good investment results if they follow these three markers. The fourth is also easy to see, but more difficult to do. Follow me.

Simple indexing. This has been around for three decades and is now as common as pizza. The vast majority of us will do better owning index funds because index investing will give us a higher return than most of the more expensive managed alternatives.

Skeptics should visit Standard & Poor's Web site. If you do, you can download its regular SPIVA report, otherwise known as the Standard and Poor's Indices Vs. Active funds scorecard. In the most recent report, its analysts found that over the trailing five-year period, 71 percent of large-cap funds had failed to beat their benchmark. The fail rate was 83.6 percent for mid-cap funds, 80.5 percent for small-cap funds, 78 percent for international funds, 89 percent for emerging market funds, 88 percent for long government bond funds, 87 percent for mortgage securities funds and 84 percent for high-yield funds.

Does everyone see the pattern here?

If you bet your future on picking fund managers, you are playing a loser's game.

Simple diversification. AKA, don't put all your eggs in one basket. You'll do better in a variety of assets because one will surely be going up when another is going down. Skeptics should consider my building block portfolios -- simple portfolios that use equal-sized investments in different asset classes to diversify. The Margarita portfolio, named in honor of the musical Buffett, has returned 12.92 percent this year to Nov. 29, while the Four Square, Five Fold and Six Ways From Sunday portfolios -- which add a REIT building block, an international bond building block and an energy building block, respectively, to the basic Couch Potato -- provided YTD returns ranging from 16.88 percent to 18.75 percent.

SIMPLE DIVERSIFICATION: THE BUILDING BLOCK PORTFOLIOS

Building from a two-fund portfolio to a six-fund portfolio, the building blocks add asset classes to increase portfolio diversification.
Portfolio YTD Portfolio Return 12-Month Portfolio Return
Couch Potato (1)

8.18

8.54

Margarita (2)

12.92

15.08

Four Square (3)

18.75

20.19

Five Fold (4)

16.88

18.31

Six Ways From Sunday (5)

17.48

19.39

(1) 50/50 VTSMX and VIPSX; (2) in thirds, adding VGTSX; (3) in quarters, adding VGSIX; (4) in fifths, adding BEGBX; and (5) in sixths, adding VGENX. All but one of these funds, BEGBX, is a low-expense index fund.
Data source: www.morningstar.com, 11/29/06
This is neither painless nor guaranteed. The Couch Potato portfolio returned only 8.18 percent year-to-date, trailing a large majority of managed balanced funds. Fortunately, this is a rare event.

Smart indexing. Researchers Eugene Fama and Kenneth French have shown that we can get higher returns if we build portfolios with value stocks -- those with prices at low price-to-book-value ratios. They also found we get higher returns with small-capitalization stocks. According to Ibbotson Associates, for instance, large company stocks returned 10.4 percent, compounded annually from 1926 through 2005. Small company stocks provided a return of 12.4 percent. The higher return was no free lunch: You got it only by surviving some catastrophic declines.

A tilt toward value stocks does much the same. Over the long term, the bargain hunters have always prevailed over the hyperventilators.

Today, the building blocks are easy to find, either as mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

Smart asset allocation. The first three milestones are pretty easy. No rocket science required. The fourth step is a lot harder. It is constructing a portfolio that gives you the highest return with the least risk. It can be done with a technique called mean variance optimization, which is close enough to rocket science to have won its creator, Harry Markowitz, a Nobel Prize in 1990.

Today a number of software venders sell optimization packages. Unfortunately, having the tool and getting reasonable results isn't the same thing. Many would do better with a Ouija board than with an optimizer.

So what do we do?

Note the milestones and then park. Until the optimizer bus comes along, make reasonable guesses and you'll do fine.

ON THE WEB

Couch Potato investing archive

Index and ETF investing archive

Looming Battle: Fundamental vs. Traditional Indexing

Dallas Morning News Archive, "The Glorious History of the Couch Potato"

Dallas Morning News Archive, "Reports on Couch Potato Investing"

Dallas Morning News Archive, "The Building Block Columns"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personal finance writer Scott Burns is syndicated by Universal Press. His twice weekly column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. He is the Chief Investment Strategist for AssetBuilder, Inc. Readers can register at www.scottburns.com. Questions/comments can be posted directly. They can also be sent, without registration, to scott@scottburns.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns and on this blog.

Click on the "Archive" navigation to see other columns. All comments are welcomed and appreciated.

Comments

 

ABModerator03 said:

Scott,

I have a little money to invest outside of my 401k, but I cannot afford the minimum investments to implement the Margarita strategy in Vanguard mutual funds. So I was hoping to add some ETFs to my monthly investment cycle at Sharebuilder.com. I cannot find equivalent Vanguard ETFs for the Inflation Protected Securities Fund (VIPSX) or the International Stock Index (VGTSX).

Two questions for you: 1) Do you think it makes sense for me to "drip invest" into ETFs through my Sharebuilder account?

2) Can you recommend Vanguard ETFs that would allow me to follow the Margarita strategy?

Thanks so much for the great columns, and any answers you can offer to my questions.
December 10, 2006 1:51 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Dear Mr. Burns,

I hope you can respond. I noticed that out of the 5 Building Block Portfolios, 4 belong to Vanguard. I wonder why? I am sure your advise is independent of any special interest. I am very disappointed with my present returns and would like to do something as simple as you are suggesting.

How can I test this method over a longer period of time ex. 5, 10, 15 year periods etc.

Sincerely,

Ali

  

From Scott Burns:

Vanguard originated index funds for individual investors and has been a leader in providing low cost index funds for more than 30 years. If you check other columns I have written, you will find that I've shown how to assemble an index based portfolio with core holdings in Fidelity funds and I've written numerous columns about doing the same thing with ETFs from different sources. You can learn more by visiting my website, www.scottburns.com. I have no affiliation or connection with Vanguard.
December 10, 2006 5:34 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Scott,

You seem to have changed the order of your building blocks from your original (March 19, 2005) column.

That column recommended a "Four Square" portfolio with American Century International Bond fund added to your Margarita portfolio. You described how this "returns us to the basic 50/50 equities / fixed income mix". Then you add REITs to the "Five Fold" portfolio. The Int'l bonds and REITs are reversed in this article.

Is there a reason for this? Does it make a difference if they are reversed? The original article seemed specific so I am a bit confused.

Thanks for your insights. Regards, Brian

  

From Scott Burns:

No reason. Just a simple mistake. The basic idea was to add asset classes but keep the portfolio in the fixed income/equities range of traditional balanced portfolios--- 50 to 75 percent equities. That range, by the way, is the best range for long term portfolio survival found in the Trinity study on portfolio distributions.
December 10, 2006 6:08 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

After years of reading about your theory of a couch-potato method of investing, I am ready to adopt your plan. Is your approach appropriate regardless of the stage of life? I am 67 years old and retiring upon the end of '06. Would you believe it to be acceptable to have a portion of the portfolio in money market?

From Scott Burns:

Yes, the approach works whatever your age. This is particularly true if you add a money market component. With zero volatility and a current yield that beats a 5 year maturity, money market funds are looking like a really nice portfolio risk reducer that actually increases return slightly!

Remember, the object is to (1) reduce costs as much as possible and (2) diversify. I started with the basic Couch Potato because it was the easiest to actually do. This is important because many people get the idea of index investing but fail to implement because it is too complicated. This is particularly true when the passive approach calls for 5 percent of this, 8 percent of that, and 24 percent of something else.

In an ideal world, we wouldn't have building blocks of equal size. We'd have different commitments to each asset class. But if you add multiple asset classes you can keep the basic proportions of your portfolio in a reasonable range.

Let me give you some specific examples:

--- The original Couch Potato, because it is 50/50 domestic stocks and fixed income, is 50 percent equities, 50 percent fixed income. That's a relatively conservative balanced portfolio.

--- The Margarita portfolio, which is 1/3 domestic stocks, 1/3 international stocks, and 1/3 TIPS (Treasury inflation protected securities) works out to being 66 percent equities and 33 percent fixed income--- slightly more aggressive than the traditional 60/40 balanced portfolio.

--- The Five Fold is 40 percent equity (domestic and international), 40 percent fixed income (domestic and international), and 20 percent REIT.

The table below updates the Couch Potato Building Blocks to 12/11/06 using Morningstar data. For comparison sake, the average moderate allocation fund returned 11.15 percent and 11.08 percent YTD and last 12 months, respectively while the average world allocation fund returned 15.99 and 16.89 percent YTD and last 12 months, respectively.

These are what academics would call "naïve" portfolios. A more complicated approach (which means fewer people would, or could, implement it) would add some component of large cap value, small cap and small cap value, and international value in an effort to capture the return premium that small cap and value stocks earn.
The Couch Potato Building Block Portfolios (12/11/2006)
Ticker Fund Name YTD 12 Mos Portfolio Name YTD Return 12 Mos Return
VTSMX Vanguard Total Market 15.29 14.31 na na na
VIPSX Vanguard Inflation Protected Securities 2.47 3.95 Couch Potato 8.88 9.13
VGTSX Vanguard Total International Stock Market 24.25 26.79 Margarita 14.00 15.02
BEGBX American Century International Bond 9.86 10.81 Four Square 19.74 20.03
VGSIX Vanguard REIT 36.94 35.06 Five Fold 17.76 18.18
VGENX Vanguard Energy 21.06 19.68 Six Ways from Sunday 18.31 18.43
Source: www.Morningstar.com 12/11/2006 data
Couch Potato is: 1/2 each VTSMX, VIPSX 50% equity, 50% fixed income
Margarita is 1/3 each: VTSMX, VIPSX, VGTSX 67% equity, 33% fixed income
Four Square is 1/4 each: VTSMX,VIPSX, VGTSX, BEGBX 50% equity, 50% fixed income
Five Fold is 1/5 each: VTSMX, VIPSX, VGTSX, BEGBX, VGSIX 40% equity, 40% fixed income, 20% REIT
Six Ways is 1/6 each: VTSMX, VIPSX, VGTSX, BEGBX, VGSIX, VGENX 50% equity*, 33% fixed income, 17% REIT
* counts energy as equity.
December 12, 2006 10:08 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Scott:

I am a long time reader of your column. Your down to earth, common style makes financial matters a little more approachable. The recent article on "Four Milestones" was especially good for both my son and I. Do you have performance figures for longer terms? I have more specific questions about how plan with a military pension and Social Security if this is the right vehicle to use. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

Regards, Floyd

  

From Scott Burns:

It's difficult to provide returns for longer periods because I don't have the computer tools for regular rebalancing. For instance, if I build the portfolios in Morningstar Principia, each investment simply grows without limit or adjustment. Well before you hit 5 years significant adjustments would be needed to have restore the original asset allocation.

Yes, this would be a good vehicle to use with Social Security and a military pension. Since military pensions, like Social Security, are inflation adjusted, you can be more conservative with your personal savings assets and still maintain a constant purchasing power. Another good thing about the most basic Couch Potato portfolios is that they are quite similar (but NOT identical) to the index portfolios in the TSP.
December 12, 2006 6:11 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Scott... In this article in the Houston Chronicle, you mentioned software for "mean variance optimization" for portfolio tweaking.

Can you recommend a particular software vendor?

Many thanks.

Ken

From Scott Burns:

The most sophisticated package is Encorr from Ibbotson Associates, now a division of Morningstar. There are many other packages available and it is possible to do optimization on Excel. The issue isn't the math or the software. It's the grounding assumptions that then drive the software. Check the web for an article "Taming your optimizer."
December 13, 2006 9:43 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Hi,Scott.I read your Dec. 11th. article with interest.In looking at the six funds I noticed a problem.Four of the funds have a $3000. investment minimum and BEGBX has a $2500. minimum.However,VGENX has a $25,000. minimum.To start a porfolio with all six funds split equally a person would need $150,000.That's way out of my range.Can you offer any good alternatives to VGENX? THANKS.

From Scott Burns:

Sorry about that. I think the minimum has been increased. In any case, there is a very easy cure: Buy the Vanguard Energy ETF, ticker VDE. You'll have to pay a brokerage commission but there is no purchase size limit.
December 14, 2006 10:47 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

The Six Ways from Sunday portfolio includes Vanguard Energy (VGENX) which is closed to new investors. Can you recommend a comparable substitute?

Thanks.

Regards, Stanley

From Scott Burns:

The alternative is the Vanguard Energy exchange traded fund, ticker VDE.   You'll have to pay a commission but there is no size limit and it is not closed.
December 14, 2006 10:49 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

In the referenced article you referenced to an international bond fund, symbol BEGBX, which I assumed would be a Vanguard fund.

I could not find it on the Vanguard website.

  

From Scott Burns:

BEGBX isn't a Vanguard fund. It is American Century International Bond fund, one of the few international bond fund that doesn't hedge it's currency positions. It is the ONLY managed fund in the Building Blocks and it's also the weakest link. Unfortunately, the only global bond funds that I know of that are index based are Dimensional Fund Advisors funds. These funds are only available through advisors.
December 30, 2006 8:26 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Scott,

Are there tax advantages investing in an ETF vs. a mutual fund?

Dennis

  

From Scott Burns:

The ETF universe is getting so large that it is difficult to generalize. If you are investing in a broad index mutual fund or a broad index ETF I think you will find both are quite tax efficient relative to managed funds. Due to the way units are added and subtracted to an ETF it is possible that you might avoid some of the taxable distributions that can occur with a traditional mutual fund in periods of redemption. As a practical matter, I think this is slicing things pretty thin since the tax liability creation in managed funds can be an order of magnitude larger than broad index funds.
January 8, 2007 1:01 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

What factors were used to determine your choice of these index funds over others?

VTSMX, VIPSX, VGTSX, VGSIX, BEGBX, VGENX
January 16, 2007 1:03 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Hi Scott,

Fine column as usual. I think you are entirely right about index funds and your comments on "mean-variance optimization". Being a geek I assembled the required datebase and wrote my own software to do this. And low and behold, it can give really screwy answers! It might direct you to build a portfolio of 50% emerging markets and hedge your bets with 50% bonds. Hey it works, it is back tested! As any scientist/engineer/mathematician knows, getting results on test data is only the start of the process. Many an expert has gone broke using his latest greatest back tested, cannot fail method to get rich.

I realized though, even done carefully, the results are not very helpful. So portfolio A has an average return of 13% with an annual variability of 26%, and portfolio B has an average return of 10% with a variability of 20% (both optimal for their return, but one has the best return and one has the least risk): that gives me no help in understanding which one gives me the best shot at a good retirement, while making sure that even if my luck is not so great I still have an ok retirement.

Portfoilio construction must be tied to a Monte Carlo simulator. So I did that. I recently started looking at the ESPlannerPlus tool from your consumption smoothing articles and low and behold, a really great tool to do that and more! And at a reasonable cost. I have a few nits to pick with design of the Monto Carlo simulation it uses, but that is a small matter: That is the way to go to do this problem correctly. I have only found a few tools that are free or not too expensive to do this, and none come anywhere close to as complete a job.

I hope when you roll out AssetBuilder you offer such a service: it will be a great advance.

Rod

From Scott Burns:

If you've got ESPlannerPlus, make sure you download and install the updates coming your way. Larry is adding some important variable flexibility such as higher rates of inflation for medical expenses, etc. Having used ESPlanner regularly and seeing its results, I now have trouble taking other financial planning software seriously. (That isn't to say ESPlanner is perfect, it just delivers a superior conceptual framework for making decisions.)

Nolan Jones, a friend and Dallas advisor who is part of the Asset Builder idea bank, is the only person I've met who appears to have made optimization reasonable and functional. Nearly 6 years ago he created a series of risk-measured portfolios for a corporate 401k plan. Today, two things have happened: (1) all the plan money has left the menu of Fidelity funds and gone into his portfolios and (2) the portfolios have tracked within about 50 basis points of their optimized returns/standard deviations.

That gives me a lot of hope.

Of course, it's only 5 years. So it could be chance, like the rest of life. And I suspect that achieving statistical certainty would require a time period beyond my life expectancy.
January 19, 2007 2:46 PM
 

ABModerator03 said:

[...] “Four Milestones for Successful Investing” by Scott Burns - excellent summary of index [...]
April 28, 2007 11:40 PM

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, will be published this spring by Simon & Schuster. "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife divide their time between Dallas and Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved. View our Terms & Disclaimers.