AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived

Equity-Indexed Annuities: Long on Sizzle, Short on Steak

steak041507.jpgAre equity-indexed annuities a good investment?

That's one of the top five questions in my mail bag these days. Thousands of people attend free dinners and lunches every week to learn about the miracle investment that will give them near stock market returns without the trauma of market busts. The basic offer of an equity index contract is this:
  • You give your money to an insurance company for a period of time, often 10 years, and it will grow tax deferred.
  • In return, the insurance company promises to give you a return based on some proportion of the rise in a major stock market index, excluding dividends. How much of the index return you get varies from contract to contract because there many crediting formulas.
  • It also promises a minimum rate of return, usually about 3 percent. And if the stock market tanks, the value of your account doesn't go down, so you get to sleep at night.
  • If you take your money early, however, you will lose much, or all, of your return through take-backs and penalties.
For the millions of investors who lost small or large fortunes in the 2000-2002 bear market, the idea of never losing money has a lot of appeal. Since equity-indexed annuities (EIAs) are often sold as a win-win proposition, investors have poured billions into this product.

But is it really that good?

That's not an easy question to answer. The contracts are so varied and so complicated it is next to impossible to benchmark them. One result is that sales people often make extravagant claims.

How extravagant? Enough that the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) declared, in 2005, that it was "concerned about the manner in which associated persons are marketing and selling unregistered EIAs, and the absence of adequate supervision of these sales practices."

My translation: "These things are being sold willy-nilly and are likely to become a big time source of expensive lawsuits for brokerage firms that sell them."

Unfortunately, that still doesn't tell us much about the actual investment. I grumbled about this to John R. Fahy, a former SEC enforcement attorney in Fort Worth. Mr. Fahy, who developed a dark and wry sense of humor at the SEC, now serves as legal counsel to investment firms. Not to worry, he said, a study of EIA performance had been done by two PhD's in financial economics from leading graduate schools, Craig McCann (UCLA) and Dengpan Luo (Yale).

The study, believe it or not, is very readable. It is also available, free, as a PDF download. If you're about to head for an event celebrating the cosmic benefits of equity-indexed annuities, I suggest you read this document first. If you like making people squirm, show a copy to your enthusiastic salesperson.

For those who can't wait, the study estimates that "between 15 percent and 20 percent of the premium paid by investors in equity-indexed annuities is a transfer of wealth from unsophisticated investors to insurance companies and their sales forces."

Benchmarking against a simple $100,000 portfolio consisting of 60 percent 10-year Treasury strips and a low cost S&P 500 index fund, the two researchers did a Monte Carlo analysis of probable returns. The simple portfolio beat the equity-indexed annuity a whopping 96.9 percent of the time.

Moreover, after ten years the expected benefit of the Equity Indexed Annuity was only $219 when it did better but the expected benefit from the simple portfolio was $33,650. Researchers McCann and Luo concluded that EIAs cost the investor about $153 for every $1 of possible benefits.

It's not a pretty picture.

If you're still looking for a way to think about this product, try this: An Equity-Indexed Annuity is the inverse of a hedge fund. The typical private hedge fund offers to take extreme risk in the pursuit of gain in exchange for 2 percent of principal and 20 percent of any gain. The typical Equity Index Annuity offers extreme safety in exchange for all dividends (about 1.7 percent a year for the S&P 500) and 50 percent of the capital appreciation.

Hedge funds are a lousy deal for the rich. Equity-indexed annuities are a lousy deal for the rest of us.

On the web:

The SEC explains equity-indexed annuities

NASD Notice to Members 05-50 on Equity-indexed annuities

An overview of Equity Indexed investments

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Personal finance writer Scott Burns is syndicated by Universal Press. His twice weekly column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. He is the Chief Investment Strategist for AssetBuilder, Inc. Readers can register at www.scottburns.com. Questions/comments can be posted directly. They can also be sent, without registration, to scott@scottburns.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns and on this blog.

Click on the "Archive" navigation to see other columns. All comments are welcomed and appreciated.

Comments

 

ABModerator03 said:

Dear Scott, I thought of you when wandering around mid-town Manhattan a couple of weeks ago. Right at the entrance of the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) was a 1974 Airstream Bambi that was probably there as an example of good art and design. I think it was 15 feet long with only one axle, and was fully self contained. It was probably one of the first examples of a trailer to contain bed, bath, shower, stove and refrigerator (I think it had a 'frig). Of course, it was immaculate, with the exterior polished to a mirror sheen and a huge museum guard standing by to enforce the "Do Not Touch" signs posted all around it. If you have not seen it, be sure to look for it the next time you are in New York. Thank you for keeping us aware of the realities of the various equity annuity products out there. Particularly seductive are some of the products intended for higher net worth clients of Merrill, Lynch, for instance. If one tried to take retirement income from one of these, I think you would drastically raise the chances that in ten years you might have no other choice than to annuitize the balance in order to maintain your level of income. Then out the window would go any inheritance you might have hoped to leave. Since none of us seems to know how long we are going to live, we can't plan to spend the last cent of our retirement savings on the day we die! Therefore, I look on the probability of leaving an inheritance as the "price" you pay for planning your retirement spending in a way to provide for a very long retirement! Regards, Jack From Scott Burns: I would love it if these products worked, but the indication is that they don't. Worse, the contract is constructed so that there is no way for the consumer to measure what the insurance company is charging for the product and its marketing.
April 17, 2007 10:22 AM
 

ABModerator03 said:

Have any studies been done to determine the historic outcome of comparing a balanced account like a Vanguard S & P 500 combined with a total Vanguard Bond fund and comparing it with a Fixed income annuity?  Withdrawing a set amount of money over a set amount of years.  Right now I can buy a fixed annuity $100,000 and receive an $8,000 annual return for life.  Historically speaking what would happen if I did this with a Vangurard balanced index fund?  Could I get the same results from a balance Vanguard fund without running out of money?

May 29, 2007 8:26 AM
 

scottb said:

Here are some figures that will appear in my column for Sunday, June 3:

Responding to my recent column (Sunday, April 15, 2007: Equity Index Annuities: Long on Sizzle, Short on Steak), the sales force pulled no punches. They complained that the study I cited had been done by economists who provide litigation support. Therefore, they said, it was biased.

If I was a good reporter, they wrote, I would not have used such clearly tainted figures.

OK, then. I was just trying to keep things short and sweet. Here, at the specific request of members of the equity index annuity sales force, is some further data indicating that this product doesn’t cut it.

Let’s start with research from one of the largest and most respected life insurance companies, Massachusetts Mutual. Several years ago they sent an analysis to their sales force to explain why Mass Mutual wasn’t offering an EIA. Over the 30 year period ending in December 2003 and assuming no dividends and a 9.4 percent annual cap on returns (because these contracts generally have some form of upside limit) Mass Mutual found that a typical equity index annuity would have provided a return of only 5.8 percent a year.

During the same period, the S&P 500 with dividends returned 12.2 percent. Without dividends it returned 8.5 percent. Riskless short term Treasury bills returned 6.4 percent a year. According to Ibbotson Associates, inflation ran at 4.8 percent over the period, so the EIA earned just 1 percent over the rate of inflation. Unlike common stocks, its return was taxable at ordinary income rates.

Of course, it doesn’t sound like the EIA will return that little when the salesperson describes it wonders, but that’s what actually happens.

Peter Katt, a nationally known insurance expert, has examined EIAs. He concluded they have little to recommend them. “My own testing,” he wrote in an article for the American Association of Individual Investors, “shows that equity index annuities have no investment return advantage compared with a fixed annuity. Equity index annuities tend to have larger commissions associated with them. Larger commissions do depress the overall yields, but more important, larger commissions are usually associated with higher surrender charges for longer periods, making them less liquid and less flexible.”

That’s called faint praise.

May 29, 2007 8:43 AM
 

Financial Investment said:

by Scott Burns Douglas R. Andrew has a new book out. "The Last Chance Millionaire: It's Not

November 9, 2007 3:02 PM

About scottb

Scott Burns has covered the changing world of personal finance and investments for nearly 40 years. Today, he ranks as one of the five most widely read personal finance writers in the country. Scott began his career as a newspaper columnist at the Boston Herald in 1977 where he was also the financial editor. Nationally syndicated in 1981 and now distributed by Universal Press, the column appears in newspapers from Boston to Seattle. In 1985 he joined the staff of the Dallas Morning News where his column quickly became one of the most widely read features in the paper. He left the Dallas Morning News in 2006 to become one of the founders of AssetBuilder and its Chief Investment Strategist. Burns is a graduate of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1962). He has written four books, including "The Coming Generational Storm" (MIT Press, 2004) coauthored with economist Laurence J. Kotlikoff. His fourth book, also coauthored with Kotlikoff, will be published this spring by Simon & Schuster. "Spend Til' the End" uses consumption smoothing to demonstrate the errors of conventional financial planning. His business experience includes working as a staffer for a major consulting company and service as a director and audit chairman of a NASDAQ listed manufacturing company. He and his wife divide their time between Dallas and Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved.