Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived
Print Article Email Article

The Problem With ‘Living Benefits’

By Scott Burns

Retiring is easy. The hard part is having a steady income from your investments. Many who retired in 1999, for instance, regretted it as the stock market fell in the next three years. Today, after a year of spectacular declines for stocks around the world, millions of soon-to-retire boomers are wondering what to do.

Enter the allure of living benefits.

These were rare as recently as 2000, and now the National Association for Variable Annuities says that at least 85 percent of all VA contracts now have some form of living benefit option.

Until this innovation, a variable annuity had just two benefits: tax-deferral of all gains and a death benefit. The contract guaranteed that your heirs would receive at least as much as your original investment -- but you had to die first.

Living benefits are a whole new deal. They contractually guarantee that you can receive an income for life, regardless of the value of your underlying account. The contracts call this provision a "guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit" (GMWB). They can be further sweetened by another benefit, the "guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit" (GMAB). This guarantees that no matter what the markets have done, your account will grow at a certain percentage rate (usually 5 to 7 percent) for a period of time. Better still, your guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit can be based on that guarantee.

Sounds like a great deal, right? A guaranteed minimum return and a guaranteed payout, plus lots of upside potential if the markets happen to soar. What's not to like?

Plenty.

Here's an example. You're 65, just retired, and you like the idea of a guaranteed 5 percent for life. You invest $100,000 in a typical contract. You start drawing $5,000 a year. You'll have that income for life regardless of what the markets do.

In fact, you can buy the same promise -- $5,000 a year for life -- for only $61,778.

How? Just purchase another insurance product, an immediate life annuity. By choosing the living benefits option, you have effectively given the insurance company 38 percent of your money. To put the loss in some perspective, it's like volunteering for a loss that is about the same size as the decline in the S&P 500 over the last year.

But what about all that upside potential?

Well, it's just that: potential. The 38 percent of your money that you lost is here, now and real. With typical contract costs of about 3 percent a year, you will enjoy account growth only when your gross return exceeds 8 percent a year. In other words, contract fees and your withdrawals are likely to devour most of the upside potential.

Now let's see if living benefits are a better deal if they are combined with a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit. Suppose you are 55 years old. You intend to retire at 65. You will leave your investment untouched for 10 years. If you invest $100,000 today and get a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) as well as a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for life (GMWB), what happens?

With a guaranteed return of 5 percent, compounded, your $100,000 investment will grow to an account value of $162,889 in 10 years. That value cannot be withdrawn in a lump sum. It is only the basis for calculating the annual income you can withdraw for life. At 5 percent, that's $8,144 a year, or $679 a month.

So, how much would it cost to have the same lifetime income guarantee in an immediate life annuity? Answer: About $100,593.

Fortunately, you don't have to have that amount today. You just need it 10 years from now. If you invest only $61,755 today in a CD-like fixed-income annuity with a yield of 5 percent, you'll have the $100,593 when you need it. Recently, I found 17 contracts with yields over 5 percent on www.annuityadvantage.com.

Again, if you choose living benefits rather than alternative insurance products, you have effectively gifted the insurance company 38 percent of your money. The enthusiastic, high-commission salesperson who likes living benefits so much has turned your cash into his gold.

Why does it turn out so badly?

Simple. The guaranteed withdrawal rates are much lower than the percentage payouts on life annuities. While a 65-year-old man can withdraw at only 5 percent in a typical living benefits contract, a life annuity would pay at 8.1 percent a year.

Big difference.

Sidebar
How to find the value of what you are being offered

Want some fun? Ask your friendly living benefits salesman to calculate the present value of his living benefits product offer. Some won't understand present value; some will. But here's an easy way to do it. Whatever the guaranteed lifetime income is, go to www.immediateannuity.com and find out how much it would cost to buy a life annuity that delivered the same income.

If the income is promised at a future date, you'll need to do a two-step analysis. First, find the cost of the life annuity that would deliver the promised income. Second, use a financial calculator to find out how much you would have to invest, today, to have that sum in the future.

On The Web

"An Alternative to Living Benefits" (11/2/2007):

National Association of Variable Annuities press release on Living Benefits:


Web site with data on fixed income, CD type annuities:

Web site with online estimates of life annuity rates:

Wikipedia: Three-card Monte:

Only published comments... Oct 29 2008, 03:00 PM by admin
Filed under:


Comments

 

bryancoolican1 said:

Great explanation, Scott. I knew the presentation was fishy, but I wasn't sure how the crunch the numbers to show what was wrong about it. Bryan
October 29, 2008 5:25 PM
 

Art said:

Well thank you Scott Burns, just a few flaws I saw immediately.... 1. If you die tomorrow, that immediate annuity is gone 2. That 10 year growth rate is wrong as every company I know of, doubles your income based amount after 10 years at most. So you're working with $200k, not $162k. Then of course there's that CD like fixed income product you mention paying 5%. You neglected to mention the loss of opportunity for it to grow to a much higher rate. So your comparing a best case scenario to worst case with the VA. Oh yeah, not to mention the loss of opportunity of quarterly lock in values. Then of course we can discuss the death benefits of the VA.
October 30, 2008 11:55 AM
 

Grayfolded said:

Art, your critique of Scott seems to have flaws. 1) Only one annuity payout option (Life with no refund) payments end at death. Life with a period certain and Joint Life options continue payments to a beneficiary and/or Joint annuitant. 2) $200,000 income base would only get you $10,000 a year income. To achieve $10,000 a year in income in an annuity payout, you would only have to invest $124,407 which would be equal to a 8.10% withdrawal rate. The Living Benefit only gives 5% withdrawal rate. In every payout annuity option the withdrawal rate is higher than the Living Benefit withdrawal rate. Also, investing $100,000 it would only take you 5 years at 5% to achieve the $124,407 needed to generate the $10,000 a year income through annuitization. With the Living Benefit you have to wait at least 10 years to generate $10,000 a year income. 3) Opportunity to grow at a higher rate and loss of quarterly lock in values? Every time you lock in a higher value with the Living Benefit the insurance company can raise the fees which will lower the return. Also, what kind of return are you talking to reset the income base? Most of these VAs with Living Benefits run around 4% in fees add inflation of 3%, you are talking a 7% return to breakeven. So you need the equities to return north of 7% to lock in a higher income base. Most Economists and Financial academics believe that equities expected rate of return will be a nominal 6% to 7%. So you may wait a long time to lock in a higher value to reset the benefit base. Further, any benefit of investing in the equities: inflation hedge and growth of income----would be wiped away when withdrawals begin on the VA. Then you need a 12%+ return to lock in the higher value on the benefit base. VA Living Benefits are a rip-off and if you need income annuitization is a better and cheaper option and Scott Illustrated that very well.
November 11, 2008 9:48 AM
 

Art said:

Grayfolded, where to begin? So you're advocating annuitizing and losing control over the assets forever? You want to lock in a rate of 8.10% and take away any chance whatsoever of gaining in an undervalued market? You want to take away any chance of having a lump sum death benefit value? Then you want to discuss inflation? Once you annuitize, what inflation adjustments do you have? In short, would you rather have income with a chance of remaining value, or income with no chance whatsoever of remaining value? I'd say you should research the new benefits before making such blanket statements, it seems you are unaware of many benefits.
November 14, 2008 2:37 PM
 

Grayfolded said:

Art, do you sell VAs with living benefits or were you sold a living benefit by a slick, overly-friendly salesperson? By the way, I am very knowledgeable in the Insurance industry's living benefits (GMABs, GMIBs, GMWBs and GMWB 4 life) and I know that there are cheaper and more effective strategies of getting lifetime income. Annuitization of a portion of a portfolio-- such as a portion of the fixed income allocation--can provide a low cost lifetime income guarantee and increase the longevity of the portfolio. The remainder of the portfolio should be invested in a low cost globally diversified portfolio, which will create the hedge against inflation. Please demonstrate to me how your living benefit provides a hedge against inflation, especially when you are taking withdrawals---when you most need an inflation hedge. One thing I do have to agree with you is that annuitization does not provide for inflation adjustments but the Insurance companies are working on offering annuitization with inflation adjustments. That will pretty much make living benefits obsolete.
November 14, 2008 4:21 PM
 

dsauers said:

Grayfolded, There is a living benefit rider with inflation hedge. The income is adjusted yearly the CPIU or the performance of you account. The problem with discussions like these is that they are like partison politics-your either on one side or another. If you promote yourself as having knowlege, you should actually have knowledge.
February 3, 2009 10:43 AM
 

Art said:

Scott, isn't it time to now write an article admitting that those who locked in living benefits may be getting their moneys' worth? Grayfolded, as dsauers pointed out, there are products that address your concern, but I'm not here to discuss individual products. The point is, for those who paid a cost for insurance to protect their income for life, they are now witnessing what they paid for.
February 13, 2009 11:35 AM
 

Grayfolded said:

Art, are you really getting your money's worth? Buying a VA with a Living Benefit, you are choosing a very high cost, inefficient way to essentially annuitize a contract. 4% in fees on a $100,000 that would be $4000. Paying $4000 a year get $5000 in income a year. To get your principal back you have to stay in the contract for 20 years which would cost you an additional $80,000 (if contract value averages $100,000) .Totaling approximately $180,000 for your outlay. Is paying that much in insurance worth it for down market protection, up market potential and an inflation hedge? Will the living benefit provide up market potential and an inflation hedge with 4% in fees, 5% withdrawal rate and inflation of 3%? That’s a return of >12% to get an inflation hedge. You need to invest very aggressively to get that return. Academics wonder these questions too. Wouldn’t it be better to purchase an inflation-protection immediate annuity with a portion of your portfolio than a VA with a living benefit? To get $5000 a year with inflation adjustment to the payments it would cost you $73,092. You would be out of the market and protected from inflation. Also, you would get your principal back in 15 years. Granted you would not gain the up-market potential but that’s where the rest of your portfolio invested in equities comes into play.
February 20, 2009 4:03 PM
 

Grayfolded said:

dsauers, you are getting living benefits confused with Inflation-Protection Immediate Annuities, which are very rare in the industry but a few companies offer them. They are annuity payments that are adjusted to the CPIU. They are a low cost, efficient way to get lifetime income with an inflation hedge. In my opinion they are superior to living benefits.
February 20, 2009 4:07 PM

Contact Us

Open Monday-Friday
9 a.m. - 5 p.m. (CST)

ph. 972.535.4040
fx. 214.556.3848
Email Us

1255 W. 15th Street Suite 240 Plano, Texas 75075