Registered Investment Advisor

Scott Burns' Articles -- Recent and Archived
Print Article Email Article

How to Be a Millionaire and Live in Poverty

By Scott Burns How to Be a Millionaire and Live in Poverty

OK, class, it’s time for the surprise quiz you’ve been warned about. But cheer up; it’s only one simple question from the “Do-You-Know-What-Your-Government-Is-Doing?” category.

Here’s the question:

If you were happily married and had $1 million waiting to be invested, where could you safely invest your money so that your annual income from that million would be lower than the official poverty level of $14,710 for a couple?(Yes, I said “lower,” not “higher.”)

Stumped? Here’s a hint. There are lots of places like this. You can find one where every missing gas station used to be.

Still stumped? Well, I can only say it is fortunate that no more is at stake than your future.

The answer: You could keep your money in any bank in America! Only in America could you have a million dollars and be nearly certain that your income would be below the official definition of poverty.

We’re not talking about a handful of piker banks here. We’re talking about almost every bank. We’re particularly talking about big banks.

According to www.bankrate.com, for instance, the highest yield in America on a one-year jumbo certificate of deposit is about 1.25 percent from E-loan, an online bank. That would get you $12,500 a year in interest on your million, so your income would be safely under the $14,710 poverty limit.

You could breathe a sigh of relief— your million won’t come close to pushing you into tacky displays of excess wealth such as the regular purchase of groceries by senior citizens.

The E-Loan rate, of course, is much higher than the national average rate that bankrate.com calculates, 0.48 percent for one-year jumbo CDs. Go to Bank of America, the largest of our deposit institutions with over 6,000 offices, and your million dollar one-year CD will earn a charming 0.50 percent, or $5,000 a year. You won’t have to worry about the wolf wandering away from your door— he’ll be right on your welcome mat, wagging his tail.

But why single out Bank of America? Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase are nearly as large with over 6,500 offices and 5,200 offices, respectively. Your million dollars will earn a whopping 0.15 percent at Wells Fargo. It will keep up with BofA at Chase.

You could, of course, increase your income from that million by committing for a longer time period. The www.bankrate.com average yield for two-year CDs is slightly higher at 0.66 percent. The website lists Aurora Bank as the highest payer for two-year CDs at 1.45 percent. That would allow your million to earn $14,500, only $210 below the official poverty rate for a couple! Significantly only 21 banks on the bankrate list are willing to pay over 1 percent.

Allrighty, then— let’s push out to a three-year commitment. Again, most banks in the country will happily support us at a sub-poverty level for our $1 million deposit. The bankrate site shows a national average for three-year CDs at 0.97 percent, indicating an income of $9,700 from a million dollar deposit. Aurora Bank holds the top spot again at 1.74 percent. The interest income from this CD, at $17,400, would exceed the poverty limit. You’d have no trouble staying below the poverty level by sticking with typical banks because only 21 banks were willing to pay 1.4 percent or more.

Only when we make a five-year CD commitment— a commitment that involves significant interest rate risk— is it likely that you’ll cross the poverty line. The bankrate tally shows an average yield of 1.63 percent, a yield that would earn you $16,300 a year. That’s a perilous $1,590 over the poverty limit. Think you could handle it?

If celebrating being able to live below the poverty line while having a million dollars strikes you as perverse, you’re right. It’s also damaging to everyone. As I pointed out last year in “Solvent Seniors and the Matrix of Misery,” our ongoing Federal Reserve low-interest rate policy reduces the spending power of retirees who have saved money. That spending power, in turn, could stimulate the economy, create jobs, and restore the income of millions of people who aren’t retired and haven’t got a dime.

That, which the anointed ones in Washington have forgotten, is what our recovery is supposed to be about— more jobs, producing more income, from healthy spending and productive investing.

Only published comments... Jul 22 2011, 03:00 PM by admin


Comments

 

Joey44 said:

“It’s the tide. It’s the dismal tide. It’s not the one thing.”

July 22, 2011 9:17 PM
 

wkj said:

Mr. Burns:  Do you seriously think that low interest rates are "damaging to everyone"?  The current low rates may be damaging to some in your audience, but most Americans are net borrowers, so low interest rates are at least somewhat favorable to them.  

Also, while increases in interest rates would certainly boost the  "spending power"  of net savers,  myself included, most people ( the net borrowers) would have to pay  more on their debts as a result of those higher interest rates so the net effect on "spending power" in the US economy as a whole would be a wash at best.  

Beyond that, of course, standard economic theory indicates that increases in  interest rates will generally reduce business investment and private sector job growth.  Also, higher interest rates would tend to furtther reduce housing values and prices.  Lastly, higher interest rates would significantly worsen the financial difficulties of all levels of government .  

Apart from these minor issues,  a significnat increase in interest rates sounds like a heck of an  idea.

July 24, 2011 11:02 AM
 

Joey44 said:

"You Need a Plan to Boost Retirement Income" , WSJ, JULY 24, 2011,By JEFF D. OPDYKE

Perhaps Mr. Opdyke - but I'm not about to let all my years of experience cloud my judgement :)

July 24, 2011 5:55 PM
 

A0110915 said:

Most people would draw down part of their money each year. If retiring at age 65 you could withdraw $3000/month or $36000/year and it would last about 30 years. If you invest the rest in a ladder of 10-year TIPS, you would be covered for inflation as well.

July 26, 2011 10:26 AM
 

myinvestmentinsight said:

It's true that our economy is in a sad state of affairs at the moment. Fighting to get a 1% return in a CD is a joke. It's important to weigh all investment options available to you prior to parking your cash in a savings account. A good financial manager will be able to provide you with the best strategy for you situation.

July 27, 2011 9:50 AM
 

CypressTexas said:

This is the first act that will transfer net worth. The second act is inflation takes off and government entitlement payments that are linked to the CPI (which conveniently omits small items like energy and food) don't keep up, but tax receipts surge because Congress has not adjusted many deductions for inflation (or the magic $250K income number that defines "rich"). Voila! Balanced budget. BTW, do you remember not too many years ago when we were heading for a balanced budget and there was panic that there would be no treasurys to put in your portfolio? What happened?

July 27, 2011 10:18 AM

Contact Us

Open Monday-Friday
9 a.m. - 5 p.m. (CST)

ph. 972.535.4040
fx. 214.556.3848
Email Us

1255 W. 15th Street Suite 240 Plano, Texas 75075