AssetBuilder Inc, - Registered Invesment Advisor - Simple Investing Smart Future
in

Today's Dallas Morning News Post

Last post 10-02-2008 11:00 AM by worriedinTX. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 09-21-2008 3:03 PM

    Today's Dallas Morning News Post

    Made me think.

    One small step on the markets would be requiring recapture -- i.e. ever dollar someone makes over $500,000.00 would be subject to recapture -- kind of like if you get an advance on a book, usually the publisher gets to off-set the advance, but if the book tanks, they can't come get the money from you.

    Where would discount mortgage brokers be if they were looking at repaying commissions made on selling the things, at least over the first 500,000.00 a  year.

    Where would the head of AIG be?  Sure, he repaid $115 million out of the billion dollars he took in bonuses, but with recapture he would be on the hook for all of that billion except for the first 500,000.00.

    That would change a lot of the short horizon thinking that goes on where people are aimed at results that are charted in this year's bonuses, with the though that at the end of next year they will be moving on.
    ____________________

    Though I keep telling people we need a candidate that says "The roads aren't good enough, you spend too much time in traffic?  We need to raise the gas tax to make up for forty years of inflation and have enough money to build and maintain roads.  Vote for me, I'll raise the gas tax and we will have good roads again."  Until someone can say that, and be listened to, we are a far way away from real politics.

     With Social Security and Drug Benefit reform next.

     Hope you are right.

    Stephen

    http://ethesis.blogspot.com/

     

  • 09-30-2008 6:46 PM In reply to

    Re: Today's Dallas Morning News Post

    Stephen,

    "Clawbacks," as they are called, are a great idea and wholely appropriate for the financial sector where profits can easily be lost due to future market actions (unlike, say, a manufacturer). One thing that no one should forget is the future most of the execs face. They may have walked away with major payments for achieving massive failure and loss, but much of that money will be lost in years of investigation and litigation from shareholders or government agencies.

    Don't read this as sympathy. I just think people need to know that it ain't over.

    Scott

  • 09-30-2008 7:09 PM In reply to

    Re: Today's Dallas Morning News Post

     I have to confess, if I were doing a bailout plan, this would be it:

    I'd tax all stock transactions at .25 per share (that is twenty five cents per share sold -- and yes, it will pretty much kill penny stock fraud) for a year, all bonds (including discount mortgage bonds) at a dollar each.
     
    I'd tax everyone tied to discount mortgage paper 95% of their income above $500,000.00 a year until they had paid in surplus taxes 150% of what they made from selling this fiasco.  I've already seen the clawback on AIG -- they got a billion, they paid back 115 million and walked away.
     
    I'd also raise the gas tax by fifty cents a gallon and send the money straight to the highway trust fund for rebuilding the infrastructure and the bridges that are getting ready to fall down.
     
    Finally, the social security withholding, I'd charge it on capital gains and every other form of income, and I'd remove the cap, so that it would apply to all income, and without a cap.
     
    I'd also institute zero basis budgeting, so that there would be significant limits on spending -- budgets would not adjust for changes in the consumer price index or anything else (which means, cancel the drug benefit until it gets funded).  I'd probably not pay for any treatment for type two diabetes other than oral medication and diet advice.  Non-compliant diabetes would not be paid for by the taxpayers.
     
    That way:
     
    1.  The financial markets would be taxed to pay for the terrible problems we are now in because of them.
    2.  There would be a reconnection between risk, profit and accountability -- and the probability that if anyone got a similar mess rolling they would catch the same sort of response.
    3.  Our roads would go back to being safe to drive on and building roads would start to get caught up again.
    4.  Social Security would head back towards solvency.
    5.  More bite into balancing the budget and capping spending, including entitlements.
     
    I'm pretty sure no one would vote for me.  After all, my platform would be:
     
    Vote for me, I'll raise your taxes, I won't give you anything you haven't paid for, and I'll start holding people responsible.
     
    Worse, I'll slow down financial markets (the tax, even though small, would do that).  
     
    Obviously, this is just off the cuff, but it is the heart of the sort of thing I think people need to hear.

     

  • 10-02-2008 11:00 AM In reply to

    Re: Today's Dallas Morning News Post

    I definitely like the idea of taxing the people who have participated in this fiasco--setting the income at 500K would eleminate most of the younger/smaller fry...

    change the Min Alt Tax to be what it was originally entended to be--a tax on fat cats. They have seen their taxes shrink under Republican tax code--stop using it to siphon money off the middle class and put it on people making more than 1M a year...

    Agree about the cap removal on SS--think that is long overdue-- but what would that do with smaller companies vs the larger ones...would that penalize them?

    Would that it included Allen Greenspan and the other govt officials who looked the other way while this debacle was building speed...

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Copyright © 2007 - 2008, AssetBuilder Inc - DFA Advisor. All Rights Reserved.