I can’t control the markets… but I can control my costs.

For most of my life I have been encouraged to focus on the things I can control. My mom, teachers, coaches, mentors… all have told me to focus on what I can control. You’ve heard the same messages. They are part of our culture, have been for centuries.

“Freedom is the only worthy goal in life. It is won by disregarding things that lie beyond our control.”
– Epictetus (1st century A.D.)

“Incredible change happens in your life when you decide to take control of what you do have power over instead of craving control over what you don't.” – Steve Maraboli, Life, the Truth, and Being Free (1999)

When it comes to investing almost everything is beyond our control. Interest rates, global trade policies, the price of commodities, changes in governments, the impact of weather on crops, you name it… all of these factors can affect our portfolio returns. All of them are beyond our control. But one thing is within our control: the fees that we pay for our asset manager’s services.

Another common adage that I heard growing up was that you get what you pay for. In many cases that is true. High-end furniture is commonly made from more expensive and rare materials. The hand-made craftsmanship can cause a single chair to take days or weeks to build. This time, effort, and skill is rightly reflected in the price. But many studies have shown this is not the case with asset managers. The research trail can be traced back half a century. More recently, Martin Gruber’s 1996 study found that high fees were actually associated with lower performance. In 2011 Gruber and Elton combined on another study: it showed that while some active managers could outperform a passive investment fund, the fees that they charged lowered overall returns. Suppose, for instance, that an active manage outperforms the passive index by 0.8 percent- but then charges 1.5 percent in fees. The net effect for the investor is negative.

Over time this difference matters.

Suppose we begin with an investment of $10,000 and it earns 6 percent before fees. Here’s how fees affect the balance after 25 years.

An asset manager who charges 1.50 percent (a typical investment manager) and another 0.35% (AssetBuilder’s average fee). If you invest with a typical fund manager then you will keep approximately 66% of the actual returns from your investments. This translates into a return balance of approximately $64,673 from the original investment. Now let’s examine the impact of lower fees on this same hypothetical performance. If you had the same performance over the same period of time but only paid 0.35% then you would retain almost 91% of your returns. This means that your return balance would be approximately $89,285. This difference of almost $25,000 is entirely due to the difference in fees and the compounding effect of the higher fees.

Typical Investment Manager 1.5%

Let’s assume that a more costly advisor is providing better returns. If that was true then we need to determine how much greater the returns would need to be to have the same return balance of $89,285 net of the higher fees.

Would you believe that the higher paid advisor would have to earn slightly more than an 11.2% return to make up for the additional fees over the years. That is nearly double the 6% hypothetical return for our original portfolio.

AssetBuilder Low Fee Investing 0.35%

Keeping costs low is one of our core values at AssetBuilder. To see how lower fees might affect your portfolio contact our advisors or to see what portfolio is right for you click below.

Let's Find Out How Much We Can Help Lower Your Fees

Contact An Advisor Find Your Portfolio